With all the talk of drugs in our drinking water, it is no wonder that experts are now calling for increased testing. As this map shows, at least one pharmaceutical has been found in the water supply of 24 major metropolitan areas right here in the USA. 
In the bigger picture, 100+ different pharmaceuticals have been detected in surface waters around the world.
Unfortunately, pharmaceuticals in the water not only affects us at the top of the food chain – drugs in the water cause problems for fish and wildlife too. From deformities in fish, to whole bird populations disappearing, it is a pandemic that needs serious attention immediately. Here is another map, this one showing clean drinking water usage around the world.
It was discovered just last summer that Coca-Cola Co’s Dasani & Pepsi’s Aquafina are not from the fresh springs many think they are.
Consumers are buying and drinking the same free, drug-infected tap water they can pour from their faucet at home. Bottled water costs 314,000 barrels of oil a year – food for thought next time you’re at the local grocery store.
The subject of water always reminds me of a tip a co-worker gave me about 10 years ago: he said his daughter invests in nothing but water and water technology-related industries; I bet her portfolio is doing great nowadays. Another person doing some forecasting is Britain’s international development minister, Gareth Thomas. As if he timed it perfectly for World Water Day, he is urging countries to act quickly to ensure world water supplies and prevent the coming ‘water wars‘.
“At the end of the day, that’s what we’re talking about, how much of the river are we leaving for the public and the ecosystem. You can’t simply dry up a river”
- Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Isle of Palms, a Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Comm. member.
For the rest of us here in the U.S., we’ve all heard about the problems with water out West, but S.C. has a few problems of its own. With industries flocking here for our low taxes & cheap payroll, several of them are intent on sucking SC’s streams dry.
Recently, I stayed at a vacation house on Lake Hartwell. The lake had lost so much water that you could literally walk across the lake bed. To illustrate the point, pictured is a clam somebody had thrown into the middle of the lake that I walked out and grabbed – without getting wet! The funny thing is, a few weeks later, the Bassmaster Championships were held on this lake – if only the TV audience knew that sections of the lake looked like this! While that problem is a climate / drought issue prime for another article, it foretells how our waterways will look in the future if corporations get their way.
As far as South Carolina Senator Chip Campsen is concerned, recent legislation to potentially allow future industries to literally siphon our rivers down to dried up streams, may also affect our way of life here in South Carolina (existing ones are conveniently grand-fathered in already). “It’s about whether when we drop a boat in a river, is it going to hit the sand?” Judging from the image above, that’s happening already Upstate.
*UPDATE: Here is a response I just received from Senator Chip Campsen on the matter:
Thank you for your correspondence regarding the Surface Water Bill (S.428). This is a very important bill that will allocate our finite water resources among competing interests for years to come.
Teddy Roosevelt is one of my heroes. A principle he expressed during his 1912 acceptance speech as the Bull Moose Party’s presidential candidate reflects my sentiments upon this current matter. Roosevelt said, “I do not intend that our natural resources should be exploited by the few against the interests of the many.”
While I am well aware it is appropriate to utilize water resources for industrial purposes, the integrity of river ecosystems – and the public’s use and enjoyment of those ecosystems – should always be our top concern.
I have been working hard to assure that enough water is reserved in our rivers to sustain a vibrant river ecosystem. Our stewardship responsibility over these resources dictates that preservation and sustainability of the resource must be our first priority. This is appropriate because our rivers are a public resource. If we falter in exercising prudent stewardship over our natural resources, we will lose the unparalleled quality of life we all enjoy in South Carolina.
Roosevelt possessed a deep sense that this stewardship responsibility was multi-generational. He said, “The nation behaves well if it treats the natural resources as assets which it must turn over to the next generation increased, and not impaired, in value.” We should follow Roosevelt’s lead, and make sure we conserve our resources for generations to come.
It’s good to know somebody is looking out for us and our waterways. How coincidental though! Surely he didn’t know I was stationed on T.R. during her commissioning 
.
Related Post(s)
Leave a comment
